You can read the talk crib and watch the video at here: Others are clamoring for solutions that focus on expert fact-checking and labeling. The problem on our hands is a lot bigger than most folks appreciate. I remember a casual conversation that I had with a teen girl in the midwest while I was doing research.
This copyrighted work contains special tracking code to identify plagiarists. Publicity is the very soul of justice. It is the very spur to exertion and the surest of all guards against improbity".
So said the famous 18th century Utilitarianist and philosopher, Jeremy Bentham. A quote occasionally revisited in more recent times to remind ourselves of the inextricable binding of these two disciplines. Even so, the law and journalism have been difficult bed partners for almost as long as history has been recorded.
Each cannot exist without the other, the relationship often swinging from deep hatred to all-embracing love. On one side, the making of laws, their inherent vagaries and the inconsistencies of their policing create constant aggravation with the other. From the reverse perspective, the sometimes brutal and harsh frankness, the incessant inquisitiveness and indiscretion often causes deep hurt and indignation with the authoritative partner.
And so goes the constant ebb and flow of the tide. All over the world, the two exist together in varying degrees of balance.
The most common and unfortunate situation being where law stifles comment, often with great brutality. A traditional 'pen versus sword' struggle.
In Australia we mightn't suffer from dictatorial oppression, instead there is almost a 'three's a crowd' situation with the competing interests and responsibilities of the courts, the parliament, the government and the press. This sometimes difficult menage a trois has its own set of pros and cons.
Two aggrieved parties are often restrained by a third in an oddly rotational adversarial forum, thereby preventing one sustaining, and the other from inflicting too much damage. The joys of democracy and the Westminster system! A system once said to be "the worst system in the world Beware The Two-Headed Beast Unlike under the overly oppressive regimes of other countries, journalists in this country only have to deal with the double-headed beast of contempt and defamation.
Each set of jaws ready to rip into the unwary media for uttering some perceived blasphemy. And this 'blasphemy' may be a simple as just telling the truth.
The sort of bravado stylised in Wilson's statement above may be fine for some, but Australian journalists like the ABC 's Chris Masters would look on that statement with horror.
Masters' situation is one where his news-sense and belief in the public's right to know drove his zeal for the story. In many respects his passion was vindicated by the subsequent Fitzgerald Inquirybut a painful lesson was nevertheless learnt.
Despite having worked scrupulously within the confines of the defamation law, powerful figures were still able to cause him and his producers considerable grief.
As a result of this, Masters now believes in-depth investigative reporting to be a "dying art". During an interview on ABC's 2BL, Masters said that he would never have touched the story if he had known that he would have to "do ten times the amount of work defending it than producing it.
The public clearly has a right to be alerted to any scurrilous behaviour amongst their elected members, the bureaucracy, big business or, less commonly, within the judiciary.
Yet, because of the so-called "chilling effect" the threat of defamation places on some public discussion, stories are simply filed under "too hard" or perhaps more accurately, "too risky".
The media becomes a flaccid tool of vested interest, mere prostitutes for their moneyed masters?
Sure, that mercenary aspect will always exist, but then so will the reverse. There will always be a movement of passionate, brimstone-bellied individuals concerned with revealing that which someone, somewhere doesn't want revealed.
Real news, not disguised advertising or PR. So how then should these motivated souls be heard? How can they protect crucial confidential sources from inquisitors?Update: On March 9, , I gave a talk expanding on my ideas in this post after a year of reflection/research.
You can read the talk crib and watch the video at here: “You Think You Want Media. Propaganda can affect millions of lives.
Military, government and media propaganda can go hand in hand. Other times, media can be affected themselves by propaganda.
This part of the attheheels.com web site looks into the very important issue of propaganda, including various elements of propaganda and some examples.
Advantages and Disadvantages of Internet Essay, Speech, Article, Composition. Advantages and Disadvantages of Internet Essay, Speech, Article: Internet is basic need of young generation today; youth can survive without food but can’t survive without attheheels.com is strong addiction of youth which is good as well as bad.
Initially internet . August When I went to work for Yahoo after they bought our startup in , it felt like the center of the world. It was supposed to be the next big thing. Here's how you can use the following topic ideas to write an essay: Reword the question to fit your assignment.
Use a question for your topic idea helps keep you organized. Professional custom writing service offers custom essays, term papers, research papers, thesis papers, reports, reviews, speeches and dissertations of superior quality written from scratch by highly qualified academic writers.