Micheli also illustrates the primary thrust of the anti-Stratfordian argument, that there exists a tremendous disparity between the life of Shakespeare and "the mind of the person" who authored the plays and poems. The Pros, Cons and the Silences The case for William Shakspere of Stratford has classical simplicity, giving it an initial advantage over the more complicated cases for all rival candidates. The name, with adapted spelling, appeared on the title-pages of plays and poems and, even though neither he nor anyone else in his lifetime clearly identified the actor with the author, no one openly challenged the attribution.
This lack of documentation is taken by many anti-Stratfordians as evidence that Shakespeare had little or no education. In his surviving signatures William Shakespeare did not spell his name as it appears on most Shakespeare title pages.
His surname was spelled inconsistently in both literary and non-literary documents, with the most variation observed in those that were written by hand.
This hyphen use is construed to indicate a pseudonym by most anti-Stratfordians,  who argue that fictional descriptive names such as "Master Shoe-tie" and "Sir Luckless Woo-all" were often hyphenated in plays, and pseudonyms such as "Tom Tell-truth" were also sometimes hyphenated.
Aristocrats such as Derby and Oxford supposedly used pseudonyms because of a prevailing " stigma of print ", a social convention that putatively restricted their literary works to private and courtly audiences—as opposed to commercial endeavours—at the risk of social disgrace if violated.
Bacon to avoid the consequences of advocating a more republican form of government and Marlowe to avoid imprisonment or worse after faking his death and fleeing the country.
Anti-Stratfordians say that nothing in the documentary record explicitly identifies Shakespeare as a writer;  that the evidence instead supports a career as a businessman and real-estate investor; that any prominence he might have had in the London theatrical world aside from his role as a front for the true author was because of his money-lending, trading in theatrical properties, acting, and being a shareholder.
Such characters are taken as broad hints indicating that the London theatrical world knew Shakespeare was a front for an anonymous author.
The language of the will is mundane and unpoetic and makes no mention of personal papers, books, poems, or the 18 plays that remained unpublished at the time of his death.
Its only theatrical reference—monetary gifts to fellow actors to buy mourning rings —was interlined after the will had been written, casting suspicion on the authenticity of the bequests. Oxford had died infive years earlier.
Some authorship theorists argue that the figure originally portrayed a man clutching a sack of grain or wool that was later altered to help conceal the identity of the true author. Spielmann published a painting of the monument that had been executed before the restoration, which showed it very similar to its present-day appearance.
Of some, next to nothing is known. Others, such as Jonson, Marlowe, and John Marstonare more fully documented because of their education, close connections with the court, or brushes with the law. The historical record is unequivocal in assigning the authorship of the Shakespeare canon to a William Shakespeare.
In the rigid social structure of Elizabethan England, William Shakespeare was entitled to use the honorific "gentleman" after his father was granted a coat of arms in This honorific was conventionally designated by the title "Master" or its abbreviations "Mr.
Entred for their copies vnder the handes of the wardens. Muche a Doo about nothinge. Thother the second parte of the history of kinge henry the iiijth with the humors of Sr John ffalstaff: Wrytten by mr Shakespere.
Mr William Shakespeare his historye of Kynge Lear as yt was played before the kinges maiestie at Whitehall vppon St Stephans night at Christmas Last by his maiesties servantes playinge vsually at the globe on the Banksyde vj d  This latter appeared on the title page of King Lear Q1 as "M.
Shakespeare" by Leonard Digges. His duties were to supervise and censor plays for the public theatres, arrange court performances of plays and, afterto license plays for publication.
Buc noted on the title page of George a Greene, the Pinner of Wakefieldan anonymous play, that he had consulted Shakespeare on its authorship.
Buc was meticulous in his efforts to attribute books and plays to the correct author,  and in he personally licensed King Lear for publication as written by "Master William Shakespeare".
He was indeed honest, and of an open, and free nature; had an excellent fancy; brave notions, and gentle expressions Shakespeare", and in The Second Part of the Return from Parnassusthe anonymous playwright has the actor Kempe say to the actor Burbage"Few of the university men pen plays well Heywood protested this piracy in his Apology for Actorsadding that the author was "much offended with M.
Jaggard that altogether unknown to him presumed to make so bold with his name. Of Shakespeare, he writes:Oxfraud When the Shakespeare Authorship page began in , it was the only site on the Internet dedicated to countering claims that someone other than William Shakespeare wrote the lion's share of the works professional literary historians have always assigned to Shakespeare.
Home of modern English Shakespeare translations & Shakespeare facts and resources. Read Shakespeare's plays, quotes and sonnets translated into modern. Introduction Many books and articles have been written arguing that someone other than William Shakespeare, the glover's son from Stratford-upon-Avon, wrote the plays .
Visit this site dedicated to the playwright William Shakespeare and his famous works. William Shakespeare plays like Hamlet, Othello, King Lear, Macbeth and the Tempest. William Shakespeare’s Sonnets and Pictures are featured as well as his poems and biography.
The Shakespeare authorship question is the argument that someone other than William Shakespeare of Stratford-upon-Avon wrote the works attributed to him.
Anti-Stratfordians—a collective term for adherents of the various alternative-authorship theories—believe that Shakespeare of Stratford was a front to shield the identity of the real author or authors, who for some reason did not want or.
Seattle Times Smith has succeeded in building up considerable suspense around the mystery of Shakespeare's authorship. But perhaps best of all is the way the novel returns us again and again to Shakespeare's words.
Smith reminds us that Shakespeare still matters -- whoever he was.