Posted on June 25, Beall has Gone Bananas:
The largest study to date, Cook et al. While only 64 papers 0. A later analysis by Legates et al. The second part of Cook et al. Every major scientific organization disagrees with the list. This is misleading since only a very small minority of scientists have actually expressed a position on AGW from these organizations.
Policy statements release by a handful of council members or signed by just the president of a scientific organization can speak for no one other than these few scientists. It is disingenuous to imply that the membership bodies in some cases hundreds of thousands of members of these scientific organizations which have never voted to approve such statements can be used in support of them.
Many members join scientific organizations for free access to organizational resources or discounts on journals and meetings. The list does not define low climate sensitivity. The list does not present a scientific argument. The list is a bibliographic resource not a scientific argument.
The purpose of the list is to show that peer-reviewed papers exist that support skeptic arguments and to be used as a bibliographic resource to locate these papers. The list has been cherry picked. The list has been debunked, discredited or refuted.
The list has never been debunked, discredited or refuted, as all known criticisms of this list have been rebutted. The existence of a criticism does not make it true, as invalid criticisms of the list have been repeatedly shown to be based on lies, misinformation or strawman arguments.
In all cases, these long refuted criticisms are now years old and have no relation to the current revision of the list. Whenever a clarification or correction was made for a legitimate issue these have always been insignificant and they have never affected the list count or changed its purpose.
The list has broken links. Anyone with an elementary knowledge of the Internet knows that links can break at any time for various reasons.
Unfortunately certain journals are apparently unable to hire competent web masters who know how to properly migrate URLs when reorganizing their websites - this problem is out of our control.
Regardless, the full citation is provided so there is no excuse about not being able to locate a paper using a search engine like Google. When this list was first created the DOI system was incredibly slow and unreliable but since that time performance and reliability has improved to a point that we feel comfortable using them.
The list has not been peer-reviewed.
The list is a bibliographic resource not a scholarly paper, meta-analysis or systematic review. Bibliographic resources are not peer-reviewed but curated by an editor. They are used as aids in locating information, in this case peer-reviewed papers supporting skeptic arguments.
The list uses "weasel words". Qualifiers are not "weasel words", but an accepted method by the scientific community to express a level of confidence.Peer review is the evaluation of work by one or more people of similar competence to the producers of the work ().It constitutes a form of self-regulation by qualified members of a profession within the relevant attheheels.com review methods are employed to maintain standards of quality, improve performance, and provide credibility.
Scholarly Open Access Critical Analysis of Jeffrey Beall's Blog - Open Access Publishing. The following is a partial list of lists of academic journals Lists of journals By topic. List of accounting journals List of literary magazines; List of logic journals; List of materials science journals; Open access journal; Peer review; Scientific journal; Scientific literature;.
Scopus is the world's largest abstract and citation database of peer-reviewed research literature. It contains over 20, titles from more than 5, international publishers. While it is a subscription product, authors can review and update their profiles via attheheels.com or by first searching for their profile at the free Scopus author lookup page.
Each journal is editorially independent and specialized with regard to its selection criteria and breadth of content.